MANUAL PENETRATION TESTING FOR WEB, API & INFRASTRUCTURE
We test authentication, access control, business logic and exposed infrastructure.
You receive confirmed findings, reproducible evidence and a remediation plan
your engineering team can work from.
01 / OUR EXPERTISE
We follow the same paths a real attacker would: from a public endpoint or ordinary user account to sensitive data, privileged actions and supporting systems.
We test sign-up, login, password recovery, sessions, role boundaries, tenant isolation, file handling and critical business workflows. Scanner results are manually reproduced before they enter the report.
We map API operations and test object-level and function-level authorization, token handling, input validation, rate limits and sensitive data exposure across user roles.
We review internet-facing services, TLS, DNS, cloud and server configuration, exposed administration interfaces and paths that could lead from one weak control to broader access.
02 / THE APPROACH
The scope, allowed techniques, test accounts, communication path and stop conditions are agreed in writing before testing begins.
List assets, roles, environments, exclusions and business-critical workflows. Set a testing window and escalation contact. Written authorization comes first.
Combine OWASP-based coverage with manual abuse of authentication, authorization, state changes and business logic. Chain weaknesses where the scope permits it.
Reproduce the issue, remove false positives, capture minimal evidence and score its technical severity with CVSS alongside its business impact.
Walk through the report with engineering and leadership. Retest agreed findings and record each as resolved, partially resolved or still open.
Coverage and reporting mapped to established guidance
03 / THE DELIVERABLE
Leadership gets the exposure, business impact and order of action. Engineering gets the affected endpoint, attack path, evidence, root cause and a fix that can be tested.
HC / DEMO-001
PATCH /api/v1/users/{userId}
Manually reproduced / Open04 / ENGAGEMENTS
Scope is built around the assets, user roles, critical workflows and changes that matter to your business. The proposal states exactly what will and will not be tested.
FOCUSED REVIEW
For one application, API, new feature or workflow with a defined security question.
COMPREHENSIVE AUDIT
For products where risk crosses screens, APIs, roles, tenants and integrations.
ONGOING ASSURANCE
For teams releasing often or adding integrations, roles and externally exposed assets.
BEFORE WE BEGIN
A list of domains, applications and APIs; the important user roles and workflows; test accounts where available; and written authorization. We then document the testing window, exclusions, data-handling rules, contacts and stop conditions.
Yes, when production is the agreed target and safeguards are in place. We avoid destructive payloads, denial-of-service activity and uncontrolled data changes. Higher-risk checks are discussed first, and an emergency contact can stop testing.
A scanner flags patterns. A penetration test follows attack paths across roles, authorization decisions and business workflows. Tools support coverage, but every reported vulnerability is manually reproduced and explained in the tested context.
CVSS 3.1 records technical severity. Priority also considers the exposed data, affected users, attack preconditions and operational impact. During a retest we repeat the original attack and related bypass checks, then mark the issue resolved, partially resolved or still open.
START WITH THE SCOPE
Share the assets, user roles, environment and release date or concern. We will reply with the questions needed to define scope, assumptions and a realistic timeline.